Brief History of UDMPU:  Birth and Evolution

 

In December of 1974, around sixty faculty members of the University of Detroit – including twenty-five tenured faculty – were summarily fired.  This was contrary to national faculty efforts over three quarters of a century to ensure that the academic community contributed to its society.  Over this time, the principle of academic freedom was defined and the practice of tenure was implemented to safeguard it.

 

To understand the UDMPU as it exists today and the issues it confronts, it is necessary to go back to the early 1970's when the University of Detroit and Mercy College of Detroit were separate institutions and neither had a faculty union.  There were active AAUP (American Association of University Professors) Chapters on both campuses to oversee the protection of academic freedom and its supporting tool, tenure.

 

There had been two attempts to form a faculty union on the University of Detroit campus in which both the AAUP and the MEA/NEA (Michigan Education Association/National Education Association) were candidates for local affiliation.  Elections were held under the control of the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board).  Both elections failed (one by an extremely close vote). 

 

Then in December 1974, the University of Detroit administration announced that it would “lay off” a significant proportion of the faculty, including some who held tenure.  The reason given by the administration for this action was “financial exigency” although many faculty felt that the real reason was to “downsize” the University.   The review process to identify the faculty to be “laid off” was completed in less than three weeks, and the terminated faculty were informed that they were to be out of their offices and off campus by the beginning of the January 1975 term.

 

The University of Detroit faculty met and essentially told the AAUP and the MEA/NEA to resolve their differences and get together.  They also decided to file for a third union election.  U-D faculty raised $20,000 from among themselves for fighting the terminations and for legal defense funds for those terminated.

 

The AAUP started the process of negotiating with the administration, a process which eventually led to the AAUP placing the University of Detroit on its list of censured institutions.  The AAUP also donated funds to the U-D faculty - the most significant being $1000 from the AAUP Chapter at MSU-O (now Oakland University).

 

The MEA/NEA provided legal counsel for the terminated faculty and for efforts of the remaining faculty to combat the administration's action and to organize.  An estimate of MEA/NEA services at that time is at least $50,000 (and is perhaps several times that).

 

A third unionization election was held and carried decisively.  The UDPU (University of Detroit ProfessorsUnion) was formed.  It affiliated with the MEA/NEA and the local (U-D) chapter of the AAUP.  The AAUP later asked the UDPU to remove AAUP affiliation reference from its documents. 

 

The union then started to negotiate its first contract.  Not surprisingly, academic freedom and tenure were at the heart of negotiations.  When the dust settled, there was a letter of agreement at the end of the contract specifying that no faculty would be laid off during the term of the contract.  This letter has continued to be part of every contract since then.

 

The second major watershed event which defined the current UDMPU was the “consolidation” of Mercy College of Detroit and the University of Detroit in 1990.  The AAUP Chapter at Mercy wanted affiliation of the union with the AAUP and so another election was held.  The vote was very close, and resulted in continued affiliation with the MEA/NEA.  The name of the union was changed to the UDMPU (University of Detroit Mercy ProfessorsUnion).

 

Since its inception, the Professors’ Union has worked to maintain and enhance quality education in a higher education setting.  The University, continually concerned about its financial environment, often makes decisions based exclusively on its own interpretation of present economic conditions.  The UDMPU provides the administration with a perspective that accounts for quality education. 

 

Looking at the present mission and vision of the University of Detroit Mercy, it is clear that the only members of the University community dedicated and capable of working toward the mission is the group of full-time faculty, most of whom are members of the UDMPU.  This fact is the basis for the difference in perspectives found in the various stakeholders of UDM.  It also explains why the UDMPU and the University have on-going issues at the bargaining table.  Quality education requires the support of the administration, but can only be accomplished by the UDMPU.  Administrative support, however, requires resources that the administration usually is unwilling or unable to provide.  That has made our job harder, but remains the focus of UDMPU actions.

 

Today, we fight the same fight our predecessor union fought:  protecting academic freedom to provide the best education this institution can provide our students

 

 

 

 

 

Return to UDMPU Home Page

 

 

Last Revision:  4 May, 2004